DAC (1991). Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance. Paris: OECD. Disponible en http://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/50584880.pdf.

Doran, G. (1981). “There’s a S.M.A.R.T.” way to write management’s goals and objectives, Management Review, 70(11), 35-36.

Peersman, G. (2014). Criterios de evaluación. Síntesis metodológicas: evaluación de impacto nº3. Florencia: Centro de Investigaciones UNICEF.

Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34(2):249-281.

Rossi, P.H., Lipsey, M.W., & Freeman, H.E. (2004). Evaluation: a systematic approach (7ª Ed.). Londres: SAGE.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. Nueva York: Guilford Publications.

https://www.betterevaluation.org/en/evaluation-options/interim_reports

https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1870/How-to-Note_Preparing-Evaluation-Reports.pdf

http://www.excellenceforchildandyouth.ca/sites/default/files/docs/webinars/_attach/evaluation_framework_template_example.pdf

https://www.volunteerflorida.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/example_process_evaluation_plan_annotated-2.12.15.pdf

https://wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u350/2017/eval-report-content-checklist_0.pdf

https://www.betterevaluation.org/en/blog/producing_engaging_accessible_evaluation_reports

https://www.betterevaluation.org/en/rainbow_framework/report_support_use/develop_reporting_media

https://www.betterevaluation.org/evaluation-options/interim_reports

https://www.betterevaluation.org/evaluation-options/final_reports

The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.